TO: Committee of the Whole - Planning and Public Works
FROM: Mayor Angela Birney
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CONTACT(S):
|
Planning and Community Development |
Carol Helland |
425-556-2107 |
|
Finance |
Kelley Cochran |
425-556-2748 |
DEPARTMENT STAFF:
|
Planning and Community Development |
Jason Lynch |
Deputy Director |
TITLE:
title
Resolution to Adopt Project Review Provisions for Prompt, Coordinated Review in Conformance with Senate Bill 5290
OVERVIEW STATEMENT:
recommendation
Over the last several months, staff have been briefing City Council on the process improvements necessary to meet state legislative timeline mandates contained in Senate Bill (SB) 5290. The enacted legislation also stipulates that if permit review timelines are not met, the City will be required to reimburse a portion of permit fees to individual applicants. The City can avoid this impact by adopting three additional measures identified in the bill. This memorandum identifies the three additional measures that can be implemented at this time as a component of the 2025-26 budget package to insulate the City from having to pay refunds.
body
☒ Additional Background Information/Description of Proposal Attached
REQUESTED ACTION:
☐ Receive Information ☒ Provide Direction ☐ Approve
Staff has drafted a resolution for City Council review and approval describing the three additional measures that can be implemented to insulate the City from having to pay mandated permit fee refunds. The resolution would be adopted together with the budget package for 2025-26. Refer to Attachment A.
REQUEST RATIONALE:
• Relevant Plans/Policies:
Community Strategic Plan - Housing Choices: Strategy #1 Increase the overall supply of housing and provide access to more affordable homes. Actions - Implement Housing Action Plan two-year goals.
Housing Action Plan - Strategy 2: Reduce the cost to develop housing through process improvements and increased regulatory predictability.
Action 2.2. Regularly assess development review processes to identify opportunities for increased efficiencies.
Fiscal Policy - City of Redmond, Washington
1. General Financial Goals
2. Operating Budget Policies
3. Revenue Policies
4. Expenditure Policies
11. Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Policies
• Required:
Senate Bill-5290 amended the Local Project Review Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW, required timelines for jurisdictions to issue a final decision on an application for land use review within the following timeframes.
• 65 Days: For project permits that do not require public notice under RCW 36.70B.110, a local government must issue a final decision within 65 days of the determination of completeness under RCW 36.70B.070.
• 100 Days: For project permits that require public notice under RCW 36.70B.110, a local government must issue a final decision within 100 days of the determination of completeness under RCW 36.70B.070.
• 170 Days: For project permits that require public notice under RCW 36.70B.110 and a public hearing, a local government must issue a final decision within 170 days of the determination of completeness under RCW 36.70B.070.
Beginning January 1, 2025, if SB 5290 timelines are not met, a jurisdiction will be required to refund 10-20% of application review fees unless additional measures from RCW 36.70B.160 (as in effect on January 1, 2025) have been adopted.
• Council Request:
At the October 8 Finance, Administration, and Communication Committee of the Whole, Council directed staff to draft a resolution for introduced to the City Council at the November 4, Planning and Public Works Committee of the Whole. The resolution is necessary to insulate the City from permit fee refund mandates and is proposed to be adopted as a component of the 2025-26 budget package. The draft resolution requested by Council is included in Attachment A.
• Other Key Facts:
N/A
OUTCOMES:
Having a predictable and consistent set of development review timelines will benefit both applicants and staff, and support City goals identified in the Community Strategic Plan and Housing Action Plan. The City has hired Matrix Consulting Group to provide process improvement services related to development review. The Matrix contract and scope of work were approved by the City Council on the May 21, 2024, Consent Agenda. City of Redmond - File #: AM No. 24-070 (legistar.com) <https://redmond.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6693812&GUID=F8A17DB7-9569-4085-AAD4-B8E363AEFD34>
The Planning and Community Development, Public Works, and Fire departments will continue their performance improvement efforts into the next biennium as we continue to identify amendments needed to the Redmond Zoning Code to implement additional streamlining measures aimed at reducing timelines. The three additional measures identified below from SB 5290 can be implemented in the meantime as a component of the 2025-26 budget package to insulate the City from the fee refund mandates. The additional measures are codified in RCW 36.70B.160 and go into effect on January 1, 2025.
(b) Imposing reasonable fees, consistent with RCW 82.02.020 <http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.02.020>, on applicants for permits or other governmental approvals to cover the cost to the city, town, county, or other municipal corporation of processing applications, inspecting and reviewing plans, or preparing detailed statements required by chapter 43.21C <http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=43.21C> RCW. The fees imposed may not include a fee for the cost of processing administrative appeals. Nothing in this subsection limits the ability of a county or city to impose a fee for the processing of administrative appeals as otherwise authorized by law;
(d) Maintaining and budgeting for on-call permitting assistance for when permit volumes or staffing levels change rapidly;
(e) Having new positions budgeted that are contingent on increased permit revenue;
Since the adoption of SB 5290, the additional measures have been codified in RCW 36.70B.160 and go into effect on January 1, 2025.
COMMUNITY/STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH AND INVOLVEMENT:
• Timeline (previous or planned):
The resolution necessary to insulate the City from permit fee refund mandates would be adopted as a component of the 2025-26 budget package.
• Outreach Methods and Results:
Staff have discussed this approach with the Master Builders of King and Snohomish County and One Redmond Government Affairs. Matrix Consulting Group circulated a questionnaire to all Redmond applicants who had submitted permit applications for review in the last three years. Feedback from that questionnaire and focused conversations with applicants that occurred in October will be used to identify on-going permit and inspection streamlining priorities for the next biennium.
• Feedback Summary:
Developers uniformly want the departments that contribute to permit review to streamline their practices. They view refunds as antithetical to departmental efforts to improve performance and are supportive of the additional measures that would insulate the City from having to pay refunds while streamlining efforts are underway.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The City contracted for and completed a developer user fee study that supports imposition of reasonable fees consistent with RCW 82.02.020. The City also hired Matrix Consulting Group to undertake process improvement services related to development review that will inform code amendments necessary to continue streamlining efforts into the next biennium. The third-party on-call permitting assistance contract will be revenue neutral because applicants will be required to pay for this third-party review service to ensure that costs are being recovered consistent with the Fiscal Policies of the City of Redmond. A process for securing City Council approval to recruit for staffing authorizations that have been set aside in the budget to support development services functions contingent upon forecasted revenue increases will be developed by the Human Resources department before the identified positions can be filled.
Total Cost:
$ 250,000: Developer User Fee Update
$ 145,000: Matrix Consulting Group Contract
Approved in current biennial budget: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ N/A
Budget Offer Number:
0000137 One-time Service Enhancement: Developer User Fee Update ($250,000)
0000021 Finance
0000042 Development Services ($145,000 plus staff support)
Budget Priority:
Strategic and Responsive
Vibrant and Connected
Other budget impacts or additional costs: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ N/A
If yes, explain:
N/A
Funding source(s):
General Fund
Development Review Fees
Budget/Funding Constraints:
Additional measures must be in place by January 1, 2025, to insulate the City from having to pay mandated permit fee refunds.
☐ Additional budget details attached
COUNCIL REVIEW:
Previous Contact(s)
|
Date |
Meeting |
Requested Action |
|
7/2/2024 |
Committee of the Whole - Planning and Public Works |
Receive Information |
|
7/16/2024 |
Business Meeting |
Provide Direction |
|
9/10/2024 |
Study Session |
Receive Information |
|
10/1/2024 |
Committee of the Whole - Planning and Public Works |
Provide Direction |
|
10/8/2024 |
Committee of the Whole - Finance, Administration, and Communications |
Provide Direction |
Proposed Upcoming Contact(s)
|
Date |
Meeting |
Requested Action |
|
11/19/2024 |
Business Meeting |
Approve |
Time Constraints:
Additional measures must be in place by January 1, 2025, to insulate the City from having to pay mandated permit fee refunds. Staff is requesting City Council to direct that the resolution identifying the additional measures taken by the City for permit streamlining be included as a component of the 2025-26 budget adoption package.
ANTICIPATED RESULT IF NOT APPROVED:
If permit review timelines mandated under SB 5290 are not met, the City will be required to reimburse a portion of permit fees to individual applicants.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Draft Resolution