Legislation Details

File #: SS 26-061   
Type: Study Session Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/8/2026 In control: City Council Study Session
On agenda: 6/23/2026 Final action:
Title: Joint Redmond and Bellevue Electric Grid Capacity Study Findings and Next Steps
Attachments: 1. Agenda Memo, 2. Attachment A: Grid Capacity Study, 3. Attachment B: Presentation
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

TO: Members of the City Council

FROM: Mayor Angela Birney

DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CONTACT(S):

Executive

Lisa Maher, Assistant Chief Operating Officer

425-556-2427

Planning and Community Development

Carol Helland, Director, Planning and Community Development

425-556-2107

 

DEPARTMENT STAFF:

Executive

Zach Houvener

Deputy of Equity & Strategic Services

Planning and Community Development

Seraphie Allen

Deputy Director, Planning and Community Development

Executive

Jenny Lybeck

Sustainability Manager

Planning and Community Development

Glenn Coil

Senior Planner

Planning and Community Development

Jeff Churchill

Planning Manager

 

 

TITLE:

title

Joint Redmond and Bellevue Electric Grid Capacity Study Findings and Next Steps

 

OVERVIEW STATEMENT:

recommendation

The cities of Redmond and Bellevue launched a joint Grid Capacity Study (Study) in December 2025, in partnership with AECOM and Puget Sound Energy, to assess the local electric grid’s ability to support future population and employment growth, in alignment with Redmond 2050. The Study also examines how increasing electrification of buildings and transportation will shape future energy demand. The Study provides a foundation that guides next steps as Redmond continues working with PSE to ensure a resilient, reliable, and clean grid amid ongoing growth and decarbonization. The Study was initiated in response to growing concerns that grid capacity limitations and long utility upgrade timelines could become barriers to development and electrification if not proactively planned for and coordinated with the utility.

During the Study Session, city staff and AECOM will review the Study findings and near-term next steps. 

body

  Additional Background Information/Description of Proposal Attached

 

 

REQUESTED ACTION:

 

  Receive Information                                            Provide Direction                                            Approve

 

 

REQUEST RATIONALE:

 

                     Relevant Plans/Policies:

Redmond 2050, Environmental Sustainability Action Plan, Climate Emergency Declaration, Community Strategic Plan

                     Required:

N/A

                     Council Request:

N/A

                     Other Key Facts:

                     Existing conditions and Study approach:

o                     PSE load forecasting and planning aligns with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commissions requirements. These forecasts are generally driven by regional market trends and growth projections and are typically developed on 10-year planning horizons.

o                     Redmond and other cities’ forecasts reflect local policy objectives as directed by the Growth Management Act, the pace of planned development, and vehicle and building electrification trends and policies.

o                     The differences in growth assumptions, inputs, and methodologies made it necessary to develop a Redmond- and Bellevue-specific electricity load forecast to better understand how future electrical loads may vary and impact the local grid.

                     Key findings from that analysis include:

o                     Building and transportation electrification are reshaping both the magnitude of electricity demand and the timing of when that load is placed on the electric grid.

o                     In Redmond and Bellevue, the primary driver of electricity demand over time is population growth and its impact on electrification.

o                     PSE has multiple electrical infrastructure projects in progress to support continued electrical growth in Redmond, with implementation planned in the coming years.

o                     With those planned utility upgrades in place, PSE is expected to provide sufficient substation capacity in Redmond over their 10-year planning horizon.

o                     Substation improvement plans do not consider the location of growth within Redmond beyond the ten-year forecast.

o                     Several Redmond substations serving key growth areas including Downtown Redmond (Spiritbrook substation), Education Hill (Avondale substation), and Bear Creek (Redmond substation), are likely to see the most constrained capacity by 2035. 

                     Key recommendations identified in the Study as a result of the analysis and four joint workshops with PSE include:

o                     Harmonize forecasting and planning: strengthen coordination, data sharing, and aligned forecasting horizons to improve growth assumptions, identify large emerging loads early, and support long-range grid planning.

o                     Streamline regulatory and infrastructure processes: promote regulatory alignment, improve permitting workflows, and coordinate project timelines to reduce delays, and support timely grid upgrades.

o                     Strengthen grid flexibility and resilience: expand demand-side management and distributed energy resources, communicate the value of grid modernization efforts to residents, and conduct more granular and longer-horizon capacity analysis.

 

 

OUTCOMES:

The Study lays the groundwork for the City’s future grid planning efforts and helps inform next steps as the city partners with Puget Sound Energy to support growth and electrification.

 

COMMUNITY/STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH AND INVOLVEMENT:

 

                     Timeline (previous or planned):

Ongoing

                     Outreach Methods and Results:

The Study’s technical analysis was completed in concert with a series of collaborative workshops that brought together staff from the City of Redmond, the City Bellevue, and Puget Sound Energy. These sessions were designed to strengthen coordination, improve information sharing, and support more aligned long-range planning.

                     Feedback Summary:

Key takeaways from the joint PSE/Partner Cities workshops included:

o                     Shared understanding that electrification and decarbonization bring major benefits but require substantial infrastructure investment, cost management, and focus on equity, process, and public understanding about electrical infrastructure components.

o                     Recognition that electrification trends and EV adoption are driving significant future demand, and that shared building, heating/cooling, and EV data between Partner Cities and PSE is essential for anticipating capacity needs and planning for load growth.

o                     Agreement that earlier coordination is critical, including earlier data sharing, better visibility into system constraints, aligned public messaging, continuous coordination across differing forecast cycles, recurring alignment meetings, stronger integration between city Comprehensive Plans and PSE planning, and improving permitting workflows for timely grid project delivery.

o                     Commitment to closer collaboration, with improved communication between city and PSE counterparts and use of shared data-exchange platforms to support more accurate and timely planning.

 

 

BUDGET IMPACT:

 

Total Cost:

$75,000

 

Approved in current biennial budget:                                            Yes                                            No                                            N/A

 

Budget Offer Number:

Environmental Sustainability

 

Budget Priority:

Healthy and Sustainable

 

Other budget impacts or additional costs:                       Yes                                            No                                            N/A

If yes, explain:

N/A

 

Funding source(s):

Grant Funding - Climate Planning Grant

 

Budget/Funding Constraints:

N/A

 

  Additional budget details attached

 

 

COUNCIL REVIEW:

 

Previous Contact(s)

Date

Meeting

Requested Action

N/A

Item has not been presented to Council

N/A

 

Proposed Upcoming Contact(s)

Date

Meeting

Requested Action

N/A

None proposed at this time

N/A

 

Time Constraints:

N/A

 

 

ANTICIPATED RESULT IF NOT APPROVED:

N/A

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A: Grid Capacity Study

Attachment B: Presentation