Skip to main content
City of Redmond Logo
File #: AM No. 19-053   
Type: Consent Item Status: Passed
File created: 4/1/2019 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/16/2019 Final action: 4/16/2019
Title: Adoption of a Resolution Relating to the Naming of Public Parks and Park and Recreation Related Facilities. a. RESOLUTION NO. 1516: A Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 874, Relating to the Naming of Public Parks and Park and Recreation Related Facilities, and Adopting this Resolution in its Place to Reflect City Council Desire to Recognize Unusually Outstanding Lifetime Service
Attachments: 1. Agenda Memo No. 19-053, 2. Attachment A: Resolution No. 874, 3. Attachment B: Proposed Resolution
MEMO TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor John Marchione
SUBJECT:

title
Adoption of a Resolution Relating to the Naming of Public Parks and Park and Recreation Related Facilities.

a. RESOLUTION NO. 1516: A Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 874, Relating to the Naming of Public Parks and Park and Recreation Related Facilities, and Adopting this Resolution in its Place to Reflect City Council Desire to Recognize Unusually Outstanding Lifetime Service

I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
recommendation

Adopt a resolution repealing Resolution No. 874 and replacing it with a resolution offering more flexibility in recognizing unusually outstanding service.
body

II. DEPARTMENT CONTACTS

Rachel Van Winkle, Deputy Director Parks and Recreation 425-556-2334
Carolyn Hope, Park Planning and Culture Arts Manager 425-556-2313
Jeff Hagen, Recreation Program Manager 425-556-2312
Jeff Aken, Senior Parks Planner 425-556-2328

III. DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND

Redmond City Council adopted Resolution No. 874 in 1991, which established policies and procedures for the naming of public parks and recreation related facilities. This resolution sets criteria (Section 1(5) that allows individuals who contributed outstanding civic service to the City of Redmond and have been deceased for a period of at least two years to be considered for having parks and recreational facilities be named in their honor.

Community members have requested that the City waive the two-year waiting period. Additionally, staff have heard from other community members who are in favor of maintaining the two-year waiting period to allow for community input and avoid emotional responses.

In February, the Parks and Human Services Committee of the Whole asked staff to bring back potential language for consideration that provide the City Council flexibility related to the two-year waiting period. Staff has performed a policy analysis of peer cities and national models to understand how t...

Click here for full text